150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- Citation
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- Parent Document
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2015-09-25
Other Sections in This Document (12)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
- 150 West End Owners Corp. v. Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., 49 Misc. 3d 1147 (2015)
Full Text
1,028 charsPetitioner 150 West End Owners Corp. commenced this nonpayment proceeding in September 2014 against respondent tenant Chestnut Holdings of N.Y. Inc., alleging nonpayment of $50,583.06 on the subject property located at 150 West End Ave., Brooklyn (subject property). Respondent served an answer which included the affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction based upon improper service of the petition, notice of petition and five-day rent demand, and that the amount of rent sought was not correct. Respondent also brought counterclaims alleging loss of income due to the subject property being “untenantable”; damages for being locked out of and illegally evicted; unspecified conditions and housing code violations; breach of the warranty of habitability; rent abatement, repair costs, etc. Petitioner contends that respondent waived its jurisdictional defenses by bringing unrelated counterclaims, and seeks an order striking respondent’s jurisdictional defenses and counterclaims and setting this matter for trial.