DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Montera v. KMR Amsterdam LLC, 193 A.D.3d 102 (2021)

Citation
Montera v. KMR Amsterdam LLC, 193 A.D.3d 102 (2021)
Parent Document
Montera v. KMR Amsterdam LLC, 193 A.D.3d 102 (2021)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2021-02-09
Original Source
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4855109/montera-v-kmr-amsterdam-llc/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (57)

Full Text

396 chars 
It bears emphasizing that defendant moved for summary judgment on a pre-discovery record. Notably, plaintiff was unable to obtain documents that had been requested before the motion for summary judgment relating to previous alleged major capital improvements and individual apartment improvements (see Stulz v 305 Riverside Corp., 150 AD3d 558, 558 [1st Dept 2017], lv denied 30 NY3d 909 [2018]).