Reichenbach v. Jacin Invs. Corp., 2025 NY Slip Op 02023 (2025)

Citation: Reichenbach v. Jacin Invs. Corp., 2025 NY Slip Op 02023 (2025)
Parent Document: Reichenbach v. Jacin Invs. Corp., 2025 NY Slip Op 02023 (2025)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2025-04-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10491002/reichenbach-v-jacin-invs-corp/ ↗

Full Text

735 chars

This Court's January 5, 2021 order left open the question of whether the owners could establish in discovery that the stipulation was enforceable (see Reichenbach v Jacin Invs. Corp., N.V., 190 AD3d 437, 438 [1st Dept 2021]). The owners failed to do so here. In addition, a review of the rent history shows that the apartment purportedly was deregulated in 2010, immediately prior to Abrams's occupancy, despite registrations of $1,339.03 per month in 2008, $0.00 in 2009, and no explanation for the purported[*3]"HIGH RENT/HIGH INCOME" exemption in 2010. The motion court properly construed this as indicia of fraud under pre-HSTPA law, warranting summary judgment in Abrams's favor on her claim for declaratory and injunctive relief.

Other Sections in This Document (58)

Full Text