Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Corcoran v. Narrows Bayview Co., LLC, 125 N.Y.S.3d 404 (2020)

Citation
Corcoran v. Narrows Bayview Co., LLC, 125 N.Y.S.3d 404 (2020)
Parent Document
Corcoran v. Narrows Bayview Co., LLC, 125 N.Y.S.3d 404 (2020)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2020-05-28

Full Text

637 chars
Plaintiffs' rent-stabilized apartment could not be deregulated pursuant to luxury decontrol laws during the period the building was receiving J-51 tax benefits (Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props. L.P., 13 NY3d 270 [2009]; Gersten v 56 7th Ave. LLC, 88 AD3d 189 [1st Dept 2011]). Given the lack of evidence that defendant engaged in fraud in deregulating the apartment, plaintiffs' claims for rent overcharge and to calculate the legal regulated rent are subject to a four-year look back period (see Matter of Regina Metro. Co., LLC v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, ___ NY3d ___, 2020 NY Slip Op 02127 [2020]; CPLR 213-a).