Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Pearl v. 305 East 92nd Street Corp., 156 A.D.2d 122 (1989)

Citation
Pearl v. 305 East 92nd Street Corp., 156 A.D.2d 122 (1989)
Parent Document
Pearl v. 305 East 92nd Street Corp., 156 A.D.2d 122 (1989)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
1989-12-05

Full Text

200 chars
Nor does a generalized allegation of "conspiracy” serve to fashion a cause of action against R&E (Alexander & Alexander v Fritzen, 68 NY2d 968). Thus IAS erred in not granting R&E’s motion to dismiss.