In a hybrid action and proceeding for, inter alia, a judgment of possession and eviction (Matter No. 1) and an action for, inter alia, a judgment of possession and eviction (Matter No. 2), which were consolidated by an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated January 31, 1992, the defendant Staten Island Meadowbrook Park Civic Association, Inc., and the defendants Michael Albano, et al., jointly appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), dated May 28, 1992, which, inter alia, determined the motion of Goethals Mobile Park, Inc., for summary judgment and their cross motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated January 31, 1992, (2) an order of the same court, dated June 19, 1992, which denied their motion for reargument (improperly designated as a motion for reconsideration) of the decision, and (3) stated portions of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Leone, J.), entered July 15, 1992, upon the decision dated May 28, 1992, which, inter alia, granted the motion of Goethals Mobile Park, Inc., for summary judgment awarding it eviction and possession of the land used and occupied by the individual defendants and denied the appealing defendants’ motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated January 31, 1992, which, inter alia, granted the application of Goethals Mobile Park, Inc., for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants from continuing to withhold rent, the defendants Margaret Filand, et al., separately appeal from so much of the *897order and judgment entered July 15, 1992, as denied their motion for summary judgment for possession and granted the branch of the motion of Goethals Mobile Park, Inc., which was for summary judgment awarding it possession, Goethals Mobile Park, Inc., cross appeals from stated portions of the same order and judgment which, inter alia, denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment for unpaid rents, and the plaintiff F.L.D. Construction Corp. cross appeals from so much of the same order and judgment, as denied its motion for summary judgment for (1) eviction and an award of possession, and (2) for the value of use and occupation of each of said units of land.