J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- Citation
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- Parent Document
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2004-11-12
Other Sections in This Document (8)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
- J.H. Taylor Construction Corp. v. Liguori, 5 Misc. 3d 74 (2004)
Full Text
517 charsThus, under any realistic interpretation, the evidence makes it painfully clear that the tenant’s “continued residency in the building places the comfort and health of others in the building at a constant risk.” (Domen Holding Co. v Aranovich, 1 NY3d *77at 125.)2 A documented case of nuisance having been established, the landlord is entitled to a possessory judgment (see Frank v Park Summit Realty Corp., 175 AD2d 33 [1991], mod on other grounds 79 NY2d 789 [1991]). McCooe, J.E, Davis and Schoenfeld, JJ., concur.