Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Citation
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Parent Document
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 1997-10-27
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/6343996/weil-v-kaplan/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (10)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
- Weil v. Kaplan, 175 Misc. 2d 482 (1997)
Full Text
423 charsIn opposition to the motion to dismiss, tenants contended, inter alia, that Real Property Law § 223-b is not the exclusive source of the retaliatory-eviction claim; that it existed in the case law prior to the enactment of the statute (see, e.g., Toms Point Apts. v Goudzward, 72 Misc 2d 629, and cases cited therein; Edwards v Habib, 397 F2d 687); and that the case law claim continues to coexist with the statutory claim.