Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Kyle Taylor, 24 N.Y.3d 742 (2015)

Citation
Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Kyle Taylor, 24 N.Y.3d 742 (2015)
Parent Document
Graham Court Owner's Corp. v. Kyle Taylor, 24 N.Y.3d 742 (2015)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2015-02-19

Other Sections in This Document (34)

Full Text

1,704 chars
and second to pay any amounts Tenant owes under this Lease."      By
its language, clause D. (3) must be read to assume that, but for
this sequenced payment of attorneys' fees, the tenant would be
entitled to demand credit for the full rent collected by the
landlord for reletting the premises, and to have that credit
applied against any amount the tenant owed under the lease.
Thus, because the amounts received are initially used to pay the
landlord's attorneys' fees, less money remains for reducing the
tenant's outstanding debt.   The landlord argues otherwise, but
the tenant is effectively paying the landlord's attorneys' fees
by way of this "relet and collect" lease provision.
            We are mindful that Real Property Law § 234 is a
remedial statute intended to "equalize the power of landlords and
tenants" (Duell, 84 NY2d at 783).    As this Court stated in Duell
v Condon,
            "[t]he overriding purpose of Real Property
            Law § 234 was to level the playing field
            between landlords and residential tenants,
            creating a mutual obligation that provides an
            incentive to resolve disputes quickly and
            without undue expense. The statute thus
            grants to the tenant the same benefit the
            lease imposes in favor of the landlord"
(id. at 780).   The Court also identified an additional purpose of
section 234 "to discourage landlords from engaging in frivolous
litigation" intended to "harass tenants, particularly tenants
without the resources to resist legal action, into terminating
legal occupancy" (id.).    With this understanding, the Court
broadly interpreted Real Property Law § 234, giving expansive