Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Citation
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Parent Document
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2002-06-06
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
- Ghadamian v. Channing, 295 A.D.2d 127 (2002)
Full Text
257 charsSimilarly, there is no basis for punitive damages here. The counterclaim alleges no more than a private wrong, for which an exemplary award is unavailable (Frame v Horizons Wine & Cheese, 95 AD2d 514). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Sullivan, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.