Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Matter of Cabrera v. Humphrey, 192 A.D.3d 227 (2021)

Citation
Matter of Cabrera v. Humphrey, 192 A.D.3d 227 (2021)
Parent Document
Matter of Cabrera v. Humphrey, 192 A.D.3d 227 (2021)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2021-01-21

Full Text

971 chars
Supreme Court had subject matter jurisdiction over this holdover summary eviction proceeding. "The order or judgment of a court lacking subject matter jurisdiction is void, and objection to the court's jurisdiction in such a case may be taken at any stage of the action, including on appeal" (Marine Midland Bank v Bowker, 89 AD2d 194, 195-196 [1982] [citations omitted], affd 59 NY2d 739 [1983]; see Manhattan Telecom. Corp. v H & A Locksmith, Inc., 21 NY3d 200, 203 [2013]; see also CPLR 3211 [e]). A court lacks subject matter jurisdiction where "the matter before the court was not the kind of matter on which the court had power to rule" (Manhattan Telecom. Corp. v H & A Locksmith, Inc., 21 NY3d at 203). The Court [*2]of Appeals has noted that "[a]bsence of competence to entertain an action deprives the court of subject matter jurisdiction; absence of power to reach the merits does not" (Lacks v Lacks, 41 NY2d 71, 75 [1976] [internal quotation marks omitted]).