Here, the parties agree that the plaintiff vacated the premises on July 24, 2020. As a result, pursuant to the express terms of General Obligations Law § 7-108(1-a)(e), the Abruzzos had until August 7, 2020, to provide the plaintiff with an itemized statement. Instead, the Abruzzos sent the plaintiff an itemized statement six days later, on August 13, 2020. As the Abruzzos failed to timely provide the plaintiff with an itemized statement as required by General Obligations Law § 7-108(1-a)(e), they failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the cause of action alleging a violation of General Obligations Law § 7-108(1-a)(e) insofar as asserted against them. Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the defendants' motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the cause of action alleging a violation of General Obligations Law § 7-108(1-a)(e) insofar as asserted against the Abruzzos without regard to the sufficiency of the opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).