History: P.A. 81-319 amended Subsec. (b) to provide that the prohibitions of the subsection do apply to a landlord who intends to use a dwelling unit as his principal residence if the unit is in a conversion condominium and at the time of conversion was occupied by a lessee described in Subdiv. (2), to clarify that a landlord may pass on only legitimate and reasonable rent increases, and to provide that if a fair rent commission does not exist the lessee may bring an action in superior court; P.A. 82-356 amended Subsec. (b) to extend from January 1, 1983, to January 1, 1988, the prohibition on landlords bringing a summary process action except in certain instances, revised the criteria for lessee eligibility, deleted the income limitations for lessee eligibility, added as a reason for eviction a “refusal to agree to a legitimate and reasonable rent increase”, and clarified the permissible reasons for eviction, the applicability of the subsection and the remedies and procedure for an aggrieved lessee; P.A. 82-472 amended Subsec. (a)(4) by changing except as provided in this section and “sections 47-76, 47-88b to 47-88d, inclusive, 47-116 and 47a-39” to “section 47-88d”; P.A. 83-94 deleted the expiration date of January 1, 1988, for the prohibition on landlords bringing a summary process action except in certain instances; P.A. 83-474 deleted Subsec. (a) re the statement of policy, rephrased, revised and reordered former Subsec. (b), specified the applicability of the section to tenants in common interest communities and added Subsec. (d) to authorize a landlord to request proof from tenants claiming protected status; P.A. 84-546 made technical change in Subsec. (a); P.A. 87-310 amended Subsec. (a)(1) to make section applicable to qualified tenants in a building or