Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Grimm v. State, 15 N.Y.3d 358 (2010)

Citation
Grimm v. State, 15 N.Y.3d 358 (2010)
Parent Document
Grimm v. State, 15 N.Y.3d 358 (2010)
Jurisdiction
New York (state)
Effective Date
2010-10-19

Full Text

275 chars
The two dissenting Justices voted to reverse and “would [have found] that [DHCR] acted rationally in complying with the legislative intent expressed in the statute of limitations set forth in CPLR 213-a and [the] Rent Stabilization Law” (id. at 34 [Buckley, J., dissenting]).