Woodson v. Convent 1 LLC, 216 A.D.3d 585 (2023)

Citation: Woodson v. Convent 1 LLC, 216 A.D.3d 585 (2023)
Parent Document: Woodson v. Convent 1 LLC, 216 A.D.3d 585 (2023)
Jurisdiction: New York (state)
Effective Date: 2023-05-30
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/9402711/woodson-v-convent-1-llc/ ↗

Full Text

784 chars

With regard to the court's determination that the tenants of apartments 1B, 3A, 4B, 4F, and 5E were previously afforded rent-stabilized leases, plaintiffs are correct that the rent-stabilized leases were not in the form approved by DHCR (see Matter of AEJ 534 E. 88th, LLC v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 194 AD3d 464, 471 [1st Dept 2021] [requirements [*2]of a rent-stabilized lease are "rigorous" and merely using "certain jargon" does not suffice]; RSC 2522.5[c][3] ["where a tenant . . . is not furnished . . . with a copy of the lease rider . . . the owner shall not be entitled to collect any adjustments in excess of the rent set forth in the prior lease unless the owner can establish that the rent collected was otherwise legal"]). We therefore modify the

Other Sections in This Document (17)

Full Text