225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- Citation
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- Parent Document
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2012-06-14
Other Sections in This Document (10)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
- 225 East 64th Street, LLC v. Prystowsky, 96 A.D.3d 536 (2012)
Full Text
174 charsWe have considered the parties’ remaining arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.