1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- Citation
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- Parent Document
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2007-07-20
Other Sections in This Document (8)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
- 1050 Tenants Corp. v. Lapidus, 16 Misc. 3d 70 (2007)
Full Text
476 chars“[W]here the parties, both represented by counsel, have freely entered into a stipulation of settlement in open court, such stipulation will generally be enforced unless public policy is affronted, i.e., where judicial enforcement of such an agreement would be the approval of a transaction which is inherently vicious, wicked or immoral, and shocking to the prevailing moral sense” (1420 Concourse Corp. v Cruz, 135 AD2d 371, 372 [1987], appeal dismissed 73 NY2d 868 [1989]).