Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Citation
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Parent Document
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- New York (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-04-05
Other Sections in This Document (13)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
- Matter of Kirkview Assoc. LP v. Amrock, 2018 NY Slip Op 2389 (2018)
Full Text
901 charsPetitioner gave sufficient notice to respondent that, as of December 31, 2015, it was terminating what was, by that point, a month-to-month tenancy (see Real Property Law §§ 232-b, 232-c). Respondent failed to remove his belongings and, in January 2016, petitioner commenced this RPAPL article 7 proceeding to recover possession. At the hearing that ensued, respondent attempted to advance the defenses of constructive eviction, breach of the implied warranty of habitability and retaliatory eviction due to his complaints to town officials. The Town Court of Town of Kirkwood refused to consider those defenses, apparently viewing them to be irrelevant to the issue of possession. Town Court ruled in petitioner's favor and issued a warrant of [*2]eviction, as well as a judgment in the amount of $3,280 for unpaid rent, counsel fees and other expenses. County Court affirmed, and respondent appeals.