aldrich v riddle, No. 24-cv-4166 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)

Citation: aldrich v riddle, No. 24-cv-4166 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Parent Document: aldrich v riddle, No. 24-cv-4166 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2024-09-12
Original Source: https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/media/19831 ↗

Full Text

678 chars

After the court scheduled an eviction hearing, Defendant moved for summary judgment, citing a
failure to properly terminate the tenancy due to the lack of a shared occupancy agreement. Defendant
argues that the termination of tenancy of shared occupancy statute is not applicable to the living
arrangement between her and Plaintiff. Additionally, Defendant contends that Plaintiff failed to meet
the statutory notice prerequisites for termination of tenancy under 9 V.S.A. § 4467. On August 7, 2025,
the court granted Plaintiff's request for an extension to respond to Defendant's motion. Ultimately,
Plaintiff did not respond to Defendant's motion. 2. Summary judgment standard

Other Sections in This Document (10)

Full Text