malone 118 main st v hugos restaurant, No. 23-cv-1881 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)

Citation: malone 118 main st v hugos restaurant, No. 23-cv-1881 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
Parent Document: malone 118 main st v hugos restaurant, No. 23-cv-1881 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
Jurisdiction: Vermont (state)
Effective Date: 2026-03-30
Original Source: https://www.vermontjudiciary.org/media/20130 ↗

Full Text

586 chars

either directly or indirectly by the tenant and “absolute triple net leases” where tenants are expected to absorb all
“costs and expenses” including structural repairs whether they are itemized in the lease or not. See Tin Tin Corp. v.
Pacific Rim Park, LLC, 88 Cal.Rptr.3d 816, 821–22 (Cal. App. 2009). Courts have generally not recognized this as
a fixed distinction but have looked to the plain language of the lease to interpret the parties’ obligations. Id. at 822.
5 The language of this section seems to indicate that each party would be responsible for obtaining and maintaining

Other Sections in This Document (36)

Full Text