Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

tender loving homecare v baldwin, No. 25-cv-5643 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)

Citation
tender loving homecare v baldwin, No. 25-cv-5643 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
Parent Document
tender loving homecare v baldwin, No. 25-cv-5643 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026)
Jurisdiction
Vermont (state)
Effective Date
2026-02-09

Other Sections in This Document (21)

Full Text

1,137 chars
1
Defendant has also filed a motion to redeem under 12 V.S.A. § 4773 based on her security deposit
argument. For both the reasons set forth below and based on the fact that the total rent claimed at this
time exceeds the security deposit, the Court finds no basis for redemption under the plain language of
Section 4773's provisions.
an order requiring Ms. Baldwin to comply with her access obligations under 9 V.S.A. § 4460(b).
The Court found that Tender Loving Homecare, LLC, because it is a corporate entity owned and
controlled exclusively by Ms. Haldane, has the right to rent out the property and act as the
landlord. Further any issue of control between the two is not relevant to the present ejectment
because there is no dispute between Ms. Haldane and Tender Loving Homecare, LLC that they
have rented the dwelling unit to Ms. Baldwin and are bound by the terms and conditions of the
lease between Ms. Baldwin and Tender Loving Homecare, LLC. As such, there was no basis to
dismiss the action or deny the motion for rent escrow based on the identity of the property owner
and the entity through which she leases the property.