Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

K & N PROPERTIES, LLC vs. WEI, ERIC, No. WTHCV256015012S (Conn. Super. Ct. 2025)

Citation
K & N PROPERTIES, LLC vs. WEI, ERIC, No. WTHCV256015012S (Conn. Super. Ct. 2025)
Parent Document
K & N PROPERTIES, LLC vs. WEI, ERIC, No. WTHCV256015012S (Conn. Super. Ct. 2025)
Jurisdiction
Connecticut (state)
Effective Date
2025-04-24

Other Sections in This Document (25)

Full Text

598 chars
1 The court notes that it has set use and occupancy at an amount of $6,200 per month and would havé done so with
either form of the letter. The use and occupancy set by the court was set usirig the evidence as a. whole and was not
based upon the letter. Although one form of the letter contains more details concerning reasons for the rent raise, the] :
Teasons in both forms are consistent. It makes no sense that any person would. knowingly use the wrong letter in
evidence because the letters are materially the same and there would be no advantage to be gained by using one
form over the other.