Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)

Citation: Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Parent Document: Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Jurisdiction: California (state)
Effective Date: 2007-10-03
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2300425/cruz-v-ayromloo/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (83)

Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)
Cruz v. Ayromloo, 66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 725 (2007)

Full Text

510 chars

Appellant conceded respondents were entitled to attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717 but only for fees incurred litigating the contract causes of action. Appellant challenged the reasonableness of the requested fees, noting the amount sought was 131 times the superior court’s guidelines for fee awards in contract cases. Moreover, appellant argued respondents could not recover fees counsel incurred in representing the other tenants, who did not have written leases containing the attorney fee clause.