Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Ceola Cooks v. Roland A. Fowler, T/a J. Edward Fowler and Son, 437 F.2d 669 (1971)

Citation
Ceola Cooks v. Roland A. Fowler, T/a J. Edward Fowler and Son, 437 F.2d 669 (1971)
Parent Document
Ceola Cooks v. Roland A. Fowler, T/a J. Edward Fowler and Son, 437 F.2d 669 (1971)
Effective Date
1971-01-12

Other Sections in This Document (96)

Full Text

496 chars
We discern, too, special reasons for allowing an appeal in the ease at bar. The jury’s verdict in respondent’s first suit establishes the fact of substantial housing violations, but the protective order requires the tenant to make monthly deposits. An important inquiry, and one that has consequences for other litigation, is the extent to which the landlord’s entitlement to that sort of protection may be embarrassed by existent judicial precedents. 11 Moreover, the guidelines erected in Bell,