Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)

Citation
Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)
Parent Document
Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)
Effective Date
1989-03-27

Other Sections in This Document (72)

Full Text

446 chars
56
Appellant argues that section 966.55(e) is not implicated because she is contesting a rent redetermination, which is governed exclusively by section 24 C.F.R. Sec. 966.4(c). We reject this argument. The fact that the situation involves a rent determination does not prevent 24 C.F.R. Sec. 966.4(b), which is captioned, "Payments due under the lease " and defines the amount of rent at issue for the purpose of section 966.55(e), from applying.