Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)

Citation
Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)
Parent Document
Head v. Jellico Housing Authority, 870 F.2d 1117 (1989)
Effective Date
1989-03-27

Other Sections in This Document (67)

Full Text

609 chars
Defendants’ response to plaintiff’s first set of requests for admissions, interrogatories and requests for production of documents for inspection and copying, states that “[JHA] would state that to its knowledge, no Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation tenant has received lump-sum Social Security benefits representing retroactive payment for delayed start of periodic payments.” This statement is uncontradicted. Therefore, as a matter of law, there exists no factual predicate for an equal protection violation, and the district court properly could not have granted appellant’s motion to amend her complaint.