Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Crochet v. Housing Authority, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)

Citation
Crochet v. Housing Authority, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)
Parent Document
Crochet v. Housing Authority, 37 F.3d 607 (1994)
Effective Date
1994-11-04

Other Sections in This Document (37)

Full Text

1,080 chars
The Tenants’ complaint alleges that THA’s actions violate their rights under: (1) the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1437 to 1437aaa-8 (1988 & Supp. IV 1992), and regulations promulgated thereunder; (2) the Brooke Amendment to the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437a (1988 & Supp. IV 1992); (3) the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1; and (4) the laws of the State of Florida. Along with the complaint, the Plaintiffs also filed motions for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to prevent THA from implementing the conversion to retail metering. After a hearing, the district court denied the Tenants’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction, concluding that the Tenants had not demonstrated that they were substantially likely to succeed on the merits of their claims; it then denied the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order as moot. (R.l-26.) The Tenants now appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (1988) the denial of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction. II. Standard of Review