Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Citation
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Parent Document
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 1973-12-20
Other Sections in This Document (49)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
- Elizabeth Marshall v. James Lynn, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 497 F.2d 643 (1973)
Full Text
1,505 charshow the program prior to the adoption of BMIR actually operated. The mere fact of administrative scrutiny of rents is not inconsistent with a predominant role for market forces, as appears from our decision today in Tenants’ Council of Tiber Island v. Lynn. The legislative history of the 1961 amendments implies that rents in § 221(d)(3) housing had predominantly reflected market changes, at least as to the important factor of rate of mortgage interest. The resulting inability of the families which Congress desired to protect to purchase adequate housing led to the adoption of the BMIR subsidy. Thus, in 1961 Congress focused on the BMIR program as the mechanism to aid families unable to purchase housing at market rents, and specifically tied that program to a mortgagor’s submission to rent controls, applied for the benefit of tenants. We do- not discern a similar protection in the form of continuing regulation of rents in behalf of ténants in housing financed under § 221(d)(3) but without the BMIR subsidy. Hence we conclude that the constitutional or statutory claims of those tenants that they are entitled to be heard before rents are increased are without merit. While the absence of rent control in such housing may mean that some tenants will find it difficult to meet rental payments, that hardship is insufficient, without a more specific statutory basis, to invoke a judicial remedy under the Constitution. See Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74, 92 S.Ct. 862, 31 L.Ed.2d 36 (1972).