Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Citation
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Parent Document
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Jurisdiction
- United States (federal)
- Effective Date
- 2000-06-05
Other Sections in This Document (30)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
- Philomena Badami v. Terry Flood, 214 F.3d 994 (2000)
Full Text
533 charsAs regards the requested $3000 security deposit on the Seminole property, Mr. Flood stated that the additional $2400 he requested of the Badamis (the difference between the deposit requested of the Badamis and the $600 deposit requested of other potential lessees) constituted additional rent. Mr. Conn, Flood's business partner, testified that the extra $2400 was "additional rent to protect [the Badamis] at the end of their lease in case they couldn't at that time pay or could not find some place else to live." Trial Tr. at 126.