Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Austin v. Town of Farmington, 826 F.3d 622 (2016)

Citation
Austin v. Town of Farmington, 826 F.3d 622 (2016)
Parent Document
Austin v. Town of Farmington, 826 F.3d 622 (2016)
Effective Date
2016-06-21

Other Sections in This Document (310)

Full Text

696 chars
3
             Appellants moved for summary judgment in their favor in the district court and
     accompanied that motion with a variety of documents, including records of various Town
     agencies and offices. These records are integral to the complaint, San Leandro
     Emergency Med. Grp. Profit Sharing Plan v. Philip Morris Cos., 75 F.3d 801, 808-09 (2d
     Cir. 1996), and we refer to them where needed in our discussion of the facts. We also
     rely on appellants’ summary judgment papers to the extent they clarify the allegations
     of the complaint with regard to costs of installation and removal of the structures,
     facts that do not affect our disposition of this appeal.