Section 8

Citation: Section 8
Parent Document: Batista v. Cooperativa De Vivienda Jardines De San Ignacio, 776 F.3d 38 (2015)
Jurisdiction: United States (federal)
Effective Date: 2015-01-13
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2769474/batista-v-cooperativa-de-vivien... ↗

Full Text

640 chars

2
       The Cooperativa contends that Batista's participation in
Section 8 was canceled as a consequence of her decision to remain
in an "over-housed" unit. Batista disputes this. She points out
that she received letters from the Cooperativa requesting that she
pick up "negative rent" checks through 2011, and -- although she
admits that neither the letters nor the checks reference "Section
8" specifically -- she claims that those checks identify her as a
Section 8 recipient through 2011.     Resolution of this factual
dispute is unnecessary to deciding this appeal, as there is no
dispute that Batista no longer receives the subsidy.

Other Sections in This Document (270)

Full Text