Skip to main content
INTERNAL PROTOTYPE — NOT LEGAL ADVICE — DO NOT SEND

In Re D.C. Diamond Head, Inc., 51 B.R. 309 (1985)

Citation
In Re D.C. Diamond Head, Inc., 51 B.R. 309 (1985)
Parent Document
In Re D.C. Diamond Head, Inc., 51 B.R. 309 (1985)
Effective Date
1985-04-22

Other Sections in This Document (121)

Full Text

462 chars
lease, the landlord claims (and the tenant does not deny), contained no notice-of-termination clause such as exists here. In that case suit was simply one for possession based on nonpayment of rent, whereas here, the landlord argues, because of the contractual notice-of-termination clause, the lease terminated prior even to institution of suit. For four reasons, I reject the landlord’s argument. First, for its holding concerning the amount due, the Trans-Lux