Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Citation
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-06-27
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
- Bullock v. Ponticello, 775 S.W.2d 286 (1989)
Full Text
592 charsAt trial a dispute arose as to whether the plaintiffs took over operation of the restaurant in August 1981 or September 1982. Defendants contended the former, plaintiffs the latter. There was also disagreement on whether plaintiffs agreed to pay $20,000 for the restaurant business and met this obligation by paying the accounts payable or whether the payment of accounts payable by plaintiff was to be reimbursed by defendants. There was also dispute about the status and amount of the inventory at the commencement of the lease and upon termination. We will not try to explain that dispute.