Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Citation
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Parent Document
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1996-01-23
Other Sections in This Document (33)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
- Siragusa v. Chang Su Park, 913 S.W.2d 915 (1996)
Full Text
222 chars807 S.W.2d 531, 534 (Mo.App.1991). The Siragusas counter by asserting that the consent agreement was an assignment, not a sub-lease, and therefore the lease provision requiring notice to Park of a default was inapplicable.