Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Citation
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-07-10
Other Sections in This Document (16)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
- Boyd v. Boone Management, Inc., 676 S.W.2d 24 (1984)
Full Text
951 charsA summary of the pertinent facts reveals that the parties entered into a written lease for an apartment in Tiger Towers Apartments in Columbia, Missouri on or about January 15, 1981. Respondent was to share the apartment with others and pay a proportionate share of the rent. Respondent paid the proper amount due for the remainder of January, 1981. Respondent did not tender her rental payment for February, 1981 until February 4, 1981, and said amount was for only half the sum due. Respondent’s reason for not tendering all of the sum due was a list of 65 separate damage items to the apartment. Respondent’s tender of payment was rejected by appellant. Appellant’s response to the claimed damage items was that they were not serious enough to require any repair. The evidence revealed the claimed damage did not render the apartment uninhabitable. On February 4, 1981, appellant placed a lock on the apartment door, preventing entry by respondent.