Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Citation
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Parent Document
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1989-09-12
Other Sections in This Document (25)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
- Property Exchange & Sales, Inc. v. Bozarth, 778 S.W.2d 1 (1989)
Full Text
681 charsCutting through the numerous issues raised by the parties as to whether certain claims are assignable, the precise issue to be determined in this proceeding is whether an assignee, not a licensed attorney, who is an officer of the corporation which assigned the claims to the officer-assignee to recover a rent-security deposit, may maintain litigation in the courts of this state when the assignor-corporation could not itself maintain suit. We hold that the as-signee-officer of the corporation, under such an assignment, cannot file and maintain an action under circumstances where the corporation itself is precluded from so doing without representation by a licensed attorney.