Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Citation
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Parent Document
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1913-06-03
Other Sections in This Document (18)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
- Flanagan v. Lazerine, 175 Mo. App. 188 (1913)
Full Text
780 charsThe court found the issue for plaintiff, as though the original tenancy was terminated on November first and a new one created through defendant’s continuing in possession, and this, too, notwithstanding his dissent from plaintiff’s proposition to increase the rent manifested by him on November first when he declined to pay it and tendered $150' instead. Obviously this judgment involves an erroneous view of the law touching the questions involved1 for two reasons: First, the notice given was insufficient to> terminate the prior tenancy at $150’ per month, and, second, it conclusively appears that defendant expressly dissented from the proposal to continue the prior relation at an increased rental at the very instant such proposition is asserted to have become effective.