Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Citation
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Parent Document
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1976-10-12
Other Sections in This Document (28)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
- Busby v. Stimpson, 542 S.W.2d 551 (1976)
Full Text
784 charsthe court found that the trial court was not in error in finding a sharecropping agreement. In that case, plaintiff landowner entered into an oral agreement with defendant for the cultivation of plaintiff’s land. Plaintiff claimed that the only term discussed was the percentage of share. Defendant claimed that he told plaintiff he would not rent for only a single year because of required improvements and that plaintiff told him to use the farm as his own. Defendant did cultivate and improve the ground from 1959 until June of 1962. Defendant decided on what crops to plant, furnished his own seed and used his own equipment. Plaintiff occupied a building on the property and shared a barn with defendant for storage. The similarity between the facts in the instant case and McNew