Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Newfeld v. Chemical Dynamics, Inc., 784 S.W.2d 240 (1989)

Citation
Newfeld v. Chemical Dynamics, Inc., 784 S.W.2d 240 (1989)
Parent Document
Newfeld v. Chemical Dynamics, Inc., 784 S.W.2d 240 (1989)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1989-12-12

Other Sections in This Document (45)

Full Text

663 chars
On October 1, 1973, Lawrence Newfeld and Frieda Newfeld, exercised the option to purchase the leased premises. The general warranty deed from the original owners to the Newfelds specified that the property was conveyed “Subject to Lease to Assign-ee [Lawrence Newfeld] of Schultz Shoe Company, Inc. [Chemical].” In January 1974, Lawrence and Frieda Newfeld executed a quit claim deed to themselves and Harry Schultz. From October 1, 1973 to May 31, 1987, Chemical remained on the premises and continued to pay $3,230.78 to the Newfelds and later to the Newfelds and H. Schultz. The Newfelds and H. Schultz returned Chemical’s checks for June through October 1987.