Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Nickles v. Auntie Margaret Daycare, Corp., 829 S.W.2d 614 (1992)

Citation
Nickles v. Auntie Margaret Daycare, Corp., 829 S.W.2d 614 (1992)
Parent Document
Nickles v. Auntie Margaret Daycare, Corp., 829 S.W.2d 614 (1992)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1992-03-24

Other Sections in This Document (47)

Full Text

620 chars
Auntie Margaret contends the trial court erred in “voiding a contract after construing it in favor of Auntie Margaret, when neither party sought rescission, and the contract was not void under Missouri law.” Thus, Auntie Margaret asserts, the trial court “erred by finding an unreasonable interpretation and voiding the contract; rather than finding the more reasonable interpretation and affirming the contract.” In their cross-appeal, lessors also assert the trial court erred in failing to award them the relief they sought and in voiding the lease, because neither party sought rescission and the lease was not void.