Section 512

Citation: Section 512
Parent Document: Yes Chancellor Farms, LLC, Plaintiff/Respondent v. Vicki Merkel (2023)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 2023-05-09
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/10629889/yes-chancellor-farms-llc-plain... ↗

Full Text

708 chars

5
        estate and the PR [Personal Representative] as parties, and the action would have
        gone forward in that form. By filing this motion, Defendants are asking the Court
        to now, after a judgment has been entered, void the substitution of the parties and
        dismiss Vicki Merkel, which would eliminate the estate and the PR from the case.
        . . . Here, what Defendants are asking is that the Court look back and deny a
        motion that was granted over two months ago, based on an argument that was
        never made at the time, and is only being made now after a judgment has been
        entered, so that Plaintiff will have no opportunity to add new parties. Discussion

Other Sections in This Document (296)

Full Text