Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Citation
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Parent Document
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2017-07-25
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5448716/boehm-v-allen/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (21)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Boehm v. Allen, 524 S.W.3d 542 (2017)
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
- Section 512
Full Text
432 charsThe Boehms argue that Allen’s continuance motion failed to comply with Local Rule 34.1 of the 19th Judicial Circuit, which applies to civil cases and permits the court to grant continuances upon good cause shown by a written motion and supporting affidavit. Because the continuance motion under section 517.071.1 is not permissive based on a showing of good cause, the local rule cannot be applied to void the statutory requirement.