Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Hurwitz v. Kohm, 594 S.W.2d 643 (1980)

Citation
Hurwitz v. Kohm, 594 S.W.2d 643 (1980)
Parent Document
Hurwitz v. Kohm, 594 S.W.2d 643 (1980)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
1980-02-05

Full Text

505 chars
We find nothing in respondents’ subsequent conduct to indicate that they thereafter elected to treat the lease as closed. Appellant cites respondents’ negotiation of the contingent lease with Brass Shutter and their demand that he return his keys to their agent and remove his equipment from the premises as countervailing evidence. We regard that evidence as totally neutral, however, as respondents would have logically pursued the named activities whether they were proceeding in their own name or *647