DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)

Citation: Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Parent Document: Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Jurisdiction: Missouri (state)
Effective Date: 1991-12-17
Original Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5253529/rahman-v-matador-villa-associates/ ↗

Other Sections in This Document (18)

Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Rahman v. Matador Villa Associates, 821 S.W.2d 102 (1991)
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517
Section 517

Full Text

386 chars

HOLSTEIN, Judge.
The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s personal injury action because, in a previous action between the parties, it was not asserted as a compulsory counterclaim under Rule 55.32(a). Plaintiff appeals. Following an opinion by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, affirming the dismissal, this Court ordered the matter transferred here. Reversed and remanded.