Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Citation
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Parent Document
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 2018-03-06
Other Sections in This Document (30)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Labarbera v. Malec, 540 S.W.3d 903 (2018)
- Section 441
Full Text
723 charsIn Plaintiff's sole point on appeal, she contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because there is a genuine issue of material fact on whether Defendant retained partial control and general supervision over the Property. Specifically, Plaintiff argues that because Defendant's daughter had a key to the Property, inspected the Property, made offers to repair the Property, purchased smoke detector batteries for the Property, and offered to replace them, the trial court erred in finding Plaintiff could not show Defendant had a duty to maintain the smoke detectors. The DAL asserts that summary judgment was proper because Defendant did not retain the control necessary to impose a duty to make repairs.