Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Sansone Group DDR LLC v. Wilma Pennington-Thurman (2020)

Citation
Sansone Group DDR LLC v. Wilma Pennington-Thurman (2020)
Parent Document
Sansone Group DDR LLC v. Wilma Pennington-Thurman (2020)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2020-06-02

Other Sections in This Document (55)

Full Text

774 chars
We also note that the July 17 consent judgment was entered pursuant to agreement of the parties, and a party
is not typically considered “aggrieved” by such judgments. Therefore, Tenant may not have had the right to
either a trial de novo or an appeal from this consent judgment because being “aggrieved” is an essential
prerequisite to either remedy. See Section 512.180; Section 512.020; see also State ex rel. Heritage Valley
Farm, Inc. v. Nixon, 88 S.W.3d 496, 499 (Mo. App. W.D. 2002) (finding court had no authority to conduct
trial de novo from judgment entered pursuant to parties’ agreement by associate circuit judge); City of Cape
Girardeau v. Elmwood Farms, L.P., 575 S.W.3d 280, 283 (Mo. App. E.D. 2019) (stating generally consent
judgment is not appealable). 4