Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Citation
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Parent Document
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1984-12-26
Other Sections in This Document (7)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
- Tower Management, Inc. v. Henry, 687 S.W.2d 564 (1984)
Full Text
589 chars*566Appellants nonetheless insist that their $4,550 cash appeal bond satisfied the requirement that the rent, as it became due, be deposited into court. The appeal bond serves but two purposes — to prevent execution on the associate circuit court judgment pending trial de novo, and to ensure that the bond will be applied to any final judgment rendered by the circuit court. It is not available as a fund for the trial court to distribute, in accordance with the Moorehead case, supra, to the landlord for reimbursement for making the premises habitable pending adjudication of the issue.