Skip to main content
DRAFT FOR ATTORNEY REVIEW — NOT FINAL

Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)

Citation
Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
Parent Document
Chiodini v. Fox, 207 S.W.3d 174 (2006)
Jurisdiction
Missouri (state)
Effective Date
2006-10-03

Full Text

469 chars
violation. Despite the temporary remedy proposed by Chiodini for the electrical wires, he did not and could not have obtained an occupancy permit by June 1, 2003, ensuring Fox-Winkler’s legal occupancy of the house. In fact, it should be noted that Chiodini did not obtain an occupancy permit for the residence until October 23, 2003. We find that that is not a reasonable amount of time to remedy the defects. Thus, this point on appeal is without merit. Point denied.