Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Citation
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Parent Document
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri (state)
- Effective Date
- 1988-06-28
- Original Source
- https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5246372/grady-v-randall/ ↗
Other Sections in This Document (11)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
- Grady v. Randall, 755 S.W.2d 655 (1988)
Full Text
668 charsGARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge. Appellant, Patti J. Proffer, n/k/a Patti J. Grady (hereinafter referred to as Tenant), *656appeals from the order of the trial court granting a directed verdict in favor of respondent, Arthur W. Randall (hereinafter referred to as Landlord), in an action for damages to personal property. On appeal, Tenant argues that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict; she alleges that she presented evidence to establish liability by Landlord for damages to Tenant’s personal goods stemming from a violation of the implied warranty of habitability in a leasehold agreement. Finding Tenant’s claim to be without merit, we affirm.