Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Citation
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Parent Document
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Jurisdiction
- DC (municipal)
- Effective Date
- 1961-05-19
Other Sections in This Document (9)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
- Wesley v. Shaftel, 170 A.2d 923 (1961)
Full Text
520 charsconcerning use of certain parking facilities. Plaintiffs’ evidence was that following the dispute landlord made an offer giving them the right to terminate the tenancy and vacate the apartment after one-week’s notice, and agreed that he would then refund to them the pro rata amount of unearned rent for that month, together with the security deposit; that acting on such offer they gave notice of a week and then vacated the apartment and surrendered the keys to the landlord. Though landlord denied he had made such an